This no‑fluff guide shows you where real FX opportunities lie, how to size risk sanely, and why multiple uncorrelated strategies trump one “holy grail.”
Let’s face it: FX is a brutally difficult market to beat. The vast majority of retail traders will fail, not because they aren’t smart or hardworking, but because they approach it in completely the wrong way.
But here’s the good news.
Despite the challenges, it is absolutely possible to make money trading FX. But you need to focus on the right ideas, avoid the traps that snare most beginners, set realistic expectations, and understand what you’re really up against.
In this article, I’m going to give you some real talk on what you’re actually facing when you trade FX. I’ll show you the bad ideas to avoid like the plague, and the approaches that can actually give you a fighting chance.
Most beginners are going to blow up a trading account when they try to trade FX. I’ve seen it happen dozens of times, and I did it myself when I started out. It’s practically a rite of passage.
The internet tells us that trading is as simple as drawing trend lines and patterns on price charts. Just identify a “double bottom,” wait for the “golden cross,” and you’ll be booking profits in no time. Add some leverage to spice things up, and you’re on your way to quitting your day job.
Except it almost never works out that way.
That head-and-shoulders pattern gets obliterated when a central bank official clears their throat on the other side of the world. That perfect support level where price “always” bounces breaks the moment large institutional players decide to rebalance their portfolios at month-end.
Technical patterns are just ripples on the surface of a deep ocean of capital flows, economic forces, and institutional positioning. Compared to what really drives markets, they’re basically meaningless.
This isn’t just my opinion. The statistics are brutal: studies consistently show that 70-90% of retail forex traders lose money.
Not because they aren’t smart or hardworking, but because they’re playing the wrong game entirely.
Currencies move because they’re expressions of entire economies.
When you buy EUR/USD, you’re not buying a ticker that might go up. You’re expressing a view that there’ll be more demand for Euros than Dollars, that the European economy will outperform the US economy in some way.
The forex market is a decentralised network where currencies are continuously priced through institutional negotiations. There’s no central exchange like the NYSE. Instead, currencies trade via an over-the-counter system where banks, hedge funds, and multinational corporations transact directly.
This creates a natural hierarchy:
And here’s the kicker: the price action that you see on your charts is merely the exhaust fumes of much larger processes. The real engines driving currency movements are:
None of these forces are visible on your price chart.
Let’s be brutally honest about what retail FX trading actually is: it’s a betting market.
When you trade retail FX, you’re not actually exchanging currencies. You’re trading a Contract for Difference (CFD) against your broker. You’re placing a wager on the movement of currency prices.
This has several important implications:
Remember those “bucket shops” described in “Reminiscences of a Stock Operator”? Places where traders could bet on price movements without any actual buying or selling taking place? Retail FX isn’t all that different.
The combination of over-leverage, volatile markets, and the broker’s ability to control execution creates a game that’s stacked against retail traders from the start.
I know that sounds like a downer, but it’s important to know what you’re up against. Despite this, and more challenges I’ll describe next, there are still some edges you can realistically harness in this market.
A critical difference between forex and other markets like equities or bonds is the absence of an inherent risk premium.
When you buy stocks, you’re compensated for taking on equity risk. When you buy bonds, you’re compensated for taking on duration risk. These risk premia create a natural tailwind for investors and traders alike.
But in forex, there’s no inherent risk premium. Currencies don’t “go up” over time like stocks tend to do. A currency only strengthens relative to another currency, which means that for every winner, there must be a loser.
The last 20 years of returns to US stocks (magenta) versus the Euro (candlesticks) dramatically illustrate this:
Image: TradingView
This makes forex trading more like a zero-sum game where we’re forced to generate returns through active trading in an efficient market. That’s difficult, but not impossible.
Having said that, there may be some noisy conditional risk premia (that is, they depend on other factors) that make good targets for retail. More on that shortly.
Ever wonder why about 90% of retail forex traders lose money? It’s not because they’re stupid or can’t read charts properly. It’s because they’re structurally disadvantaged in multiple ways. Here are some ways you can come unstuck so you know what to avoid:
Retail accounts often deploy 50:1 leverage or higher, amplifying losses from minor fluctuations.
I’ve seen traders with solid strategies blow up their accounts simply because they traded too big (myself included). No edge can save you if you’re overleveraged.
When you’re severely over-leveraged, your chances of total capital loss become nearly 100% – even if you’re the greatest trader in the world. The math is simply not in your favour.
Given the structural execution disadvantages, it makes no sense for retail traders to attempt “scalping” trades in FX. Even if you have an edge, you’ll get eaten by costs – it’s only a matter of time.
Institutions access real-time liquidity data and proprietary bank research. Retail traders rely on free delayed news and limited liquidity information. This makes certain trades off limits for retailers.
Most retail forex courses teach Fibonacci retracements but neglect interest rate parity or balance-of-payments dynamics, concepts fundamental to currency valuation.
Consequently, traders misattribute losses to imperfect pattern recognition rather than ignorance of capital flow shifts. For example, yen rallies during risk-off events aren’t anomalies but predictable flows into Japan’s net creditor status, a nuance absent from most retail education.
With all those disadvantages, you might think that I wouldn’t go near FX. But that’s not true. FX does actually have a place in my portfolio – I just approach it with an understanding of where I can and can’t compete.
So with all these disadvantages, how can a retail trader survive in FX? Here are some defensive maneuvers that level the playing field:
First, pick a large broker in a strongly regulated jurisdiction. The last thing you need is to worry about counterparty risk or shady execution practices.
Just because you can leverage yourself up to your eyeballs doesn’t mean you should.
In fact, you definitely shouldn’t.
Size conservatively, and take advantage of your ability to take small trades and diversify effectively even at small capital levels.
It’s trivial to create a backtest that does well scalping 5-minute bars on EUR/USD – but you’re dreaming if you think you’re going to be able to execute that effectively against a retail FX broker.
For most strategies, you should be looking at average holding periods of days to weeks. Slowing down levels the playing field.
Trying to scalp retail FX is like trying to perform brain surgery on a roller coaster. Don’t even think about it.
We simply cannot accurately model the impact of our price feeds, spreads, slippage and swap costs in backtests. We need to be conservative in our expectations, cross-validate as much as possible, and ensure we have a solid rationale for each trade.
So with all these challenges, where can retail traders find edge in forex?
The answer isn’t finding the perfect indicator setting or chart pattern. It’s understanding the underlying drivers of supply and demand in currency markets.
Real edge comes from:
When pension funds must rebalance portfolios at month-end, or when corporations need to convert currencies for business operations, they create predictable pressures on prices. These participants aren’t trying to maximise profits on their forex trades – they’re just executing necessary business.
This creates opportunities.
While there’s no inherent risk premium in forex, there are conditional ones that can be harvested systematically.
This paper highlights an intraday risk premium associated with the business hours associated with different currencies. And if you dig into some data, you find a noisy tendency for foreign currencies to appreciate during US business hours (between the dashed lines in the chart below):
Hourly returns to different currencies against USD. Image: robotwealth.com
I traded this a few years ago, but stopped when FX vol got really low.
If you dig into some data, you’ll also notice that certain currencies (the “risk-off” currencies such as CHF and JPY) tend to appreciate into the end of the week, perhaps as an aversion to weekend risk. It’s a noisy effect that won’t shoot the lights out, but it’s one that will probably persist.
The classic carry trade is to buy high-interest-rate currencies and sell low-interest-rate currencies. This trade has shown long-term profitability, but is again one of those noisy effects that won’t play out all the time. It tends to have some nasty negative skew too (outsized negative returns):
Image: robotwealth.com
The mark-up that the typical FX broker charges on the swap (the financing costs of holding a CFD position) will eat into these carry returns – but you might be able to make it work.
Many currencies exhibit seasonal patterns tied to fiscal year-ends, tax seasons, commodity supply/demand dynamics, or even tourism cycles. These effects create temporary imbalances that can be traded systematically.
For example, the Japanese yen often strengthens at the end of the Japanese fiscal year in March as Japanese companies repatriate overseas profits.
You can get quite esoteric with this stuff.
A while back, someone told me that the New Zealand dollar exhibits predictable annual cycles tied to milk production (a significant industry in NZ).
Source: Dairy Companies Association of NZ
And indeed, if you test this idea, you find that you can squeeze out a Sharpe 0.5 edge:
Image: robotwealth.com
That doesn’t sound very exciting, and it certainly is a very boring trade. But the point is that these are the sorts of things retailers stand a chance of making money in. And if you combine several of these mediocre edges, you can get something greater than the sum of the parts.
In a later article, we’ll look at some seasonal FX edges.
As a retail trader, your greatest edge is your ability to trade multiple uncorrelated systems across different markets. While institutional traders are often siloed into specific strategies or markets, you can be nimble and diversify across edges.
The key mindset shift is to stop assuming that one single strategy has to do all the heavy lifting. In FX, it can’t.
The sorts of edges that a retailer can realistically harness will never shoot the lights out alone.
But if you instead trade multiple systematic approaches across different currencies and time horizons, your portfolio result will be much better. Some systems will underperform while others overperform, smoothing your equity curve.
Forex liquidity follows predictable patterns as capital migrates across time zones.
It tends to peak during London-New York overlap (8 AM–12 PM EST), narrowing EUR/USD spreads to 0.1 pips. Asian sessions see thinner volumes, amplifying slippage during news events.
Retail traders ignoring these cycles face inflated costs; entering GBP/USD during Asian hours risks 3–5 pip spreads versus 0.8 pips in London. This might not sound like much, but it can make a huge difference.
Understanding these patterns won’t give you an edge as such, but they offer clues to when you’re likely to see better trading conditions (lower costs).
Given everything we’ve discussed, here are some practical strategies for retail forex traders:
You’re not going to outpredict the market regarding the next economic data release, and your chance of scalping an order book you can’t see and that can requote on you approaches zero.
But you do stand a chance if you play uncompetitive games.
For example, the weekend risk premium effect, while noisy, is unlikely to be arbitraged away any time soon:
Focus on games you have a chance of winning.
The reality is that FX is a broadly challenging asset class for retailers. The only edges you stand a chance of harnessing are, to be blunt, mediocre.
But while we can’t engineer the edge we want (the market doesn’t care about that), we can have the right expectations. If you can get a Sharpe 1 portfolio from your FX trading, I would call that a win.
Think of trading as a business, not a lottery ticket. Your goal should be to extract consistent small edges from the market over time, compounding your capital gradually.
If you’re doing it right, it should feel like a long, slow grind.
Instead of trying to perfect a single trading system, develop multiple uncorrelated approaches based on different market inefficiencies. This might include (just as an example):
Even better, view FX as only one small part of your trading operation. There are edges in equities, bonds, volatility products, cryptocurrencies, and more that are open to retailers.
By trading multiple systems simultaneously, you smooth your equity curve and reduce the chance that you’re trading without an edge.
Be very careful with leverage.
As a general rule, use it to enhance the capital efficiency of your trading, not to take bets that are too big for your portfolio.
For example, you might keep only enough capital in your FX account to cover margin requirements (plus some buffer) so that you can invest the unused portion in liquid risk assets. This requires that you have good processes in place for monitoring your margin and moving capital when you need to.
Let’s pull this all together into a practical framework for forex trading:
This approach won’t make you an overnight millionaire. But it will give you a fighting chance in a market where most retail traders fail.
FX is a notoriously challenging market, and most retail traders will ultimately fail. But that doesn’t mean you have to be one of them.
By understanding what you’re really up against, avoiding the common traps, and focusing on approaches that actually work, you can give yourself a fighting chance.
Remember that retail FX is essentially a betting market, where the rules are controlled by the person you’re betting against. But with the right approach, defensive maneuvers, and realistic expectations, you can navigate this challenging landscape successfully.
The path isn’t easy, but it is possible. Trade broadly and at a sensible size. Be humble about what you can realistically achieve. Focus on developing multiple uncorrelated systems rather than trying to perfect a single approach. And always, always manage your risk.
Do these things, and you’ll already be ahead of 90% of retail forex traders.
Kris Longmore is the founder of Robot Wealth, where he trades his own book and teaches traders to think like quants without drowning in jargon. With a background in proprietary trading, data science, engineering and earth science, he blends analytical skill with real-world trading pragmatism. When he’s not researching edges, tinkering with his systems, or helping traders build their skills, you’ll find him on the mats, in the garden, or at the beach.