Advertising DisclosureWe're committed to the highest standards of editorial integrity. Still, it's crucial to recognize that some products we mention come from our partners.

Here's an insight into how we make money. While we strive to be comprehensive, the compensation we receive can influence the products, companies, or services we showcase and review. Not all available options may be featured on this page.

4 Best Prop Firms to Trade With in 2026: Ranked and Reviewed

By
Muhammad Soban
Reviewed By
Amy Jones
Updated: Jan 18, 2026

We know choosing the right prop firm can be challenging. You’re trusting a company with your money, valuable trading time, and the expectation that you’ll receive prompt payouts when you ask for them. The problem is that most prop firms have similar profit splits, similar rules, and similar promises, so it’s hard to understand which one you can trust.

With that in mind, we did the heavy lifting instead of relying on marketing claims. We spent over 120 hours researching and hands-on testing of more than 40 prop firms, backed by impartial data, to see how they perform in real trading conditions. We tested: payout reliability, rule enforcement, challenge structure, profit-to-drawdown balance, pricing, trading conditions, platform stability, and customer support.

We also know that there’s no single “one fits all” prop firm; every trader has unique needs. Because of that, we ranked and grouped the top performers by category to make it easier to find the firm that fits how you trade and what matters most to you when choosing a prop firm.

Below are the prop firms that performed best in our testing for 2026, along with clear explanations for why each one earned its spot on the list.

List of Top Prop Trading Firms in 2026

Low spreads and commissions, 4.8 Trustpilot rating, Scaling up to 4 million

$32.99 entry fees, Multiple platforms, Fast & Transparent Payouts

On Demand Payouts, Flexible Profit Split, Flexible Payout Frequency

Aggressive Scaling plan Up to $4M, Diverse Challenge Programs, 100+ trading instruments including stocks

How Did FXEmpire Choose the Best Prop Firm

When I was starting out in prop trading, the hardest part was knowing which firm was actually worth trusting. Many looked good on paper, but it wasn’t always clear how they performed once real money and payouts were involved.

To make that decision easier for you, we purchased challenges ourselves and tested each firm under real trading conditions, from onboarding and platform performance to payout handling. We then benchmarked firms against industry standards, scoring each one using our rating system based on trust, payout reliability, trading rules, costs, platform stability, and long-term viability.

 

  • Prop Firm Reputation & Trust: I’ve seen prop firms shut down or deny payouts after traders become profitable, which is why trust and reputation matter most when choosing a firm. To assess this, we examined each firm’s operating history and real trader experiences, reviewing verified feedback and recurring complaints on platforms like Trustpilot, Prop Firm Match, and other independent sources. This helped us understand how firms treat traders in practice, not just how they market themselves.
  • Payout History & Reliability: We checked the payout history and reliability by reviewing records from sources such as Prop Firm Match and Payout Junction, along with discussions across Discord, social media, and trader communities. When payouts were reported as rejected, we checked for valid reasons like KYC issues or prohibited trading behavior and contacted firms when clarification was needed. Unresolved complaints counted against a firm’s reliability.
  • Account Affordability & Pricing: We calculated how much trading capital you actually get for the money you put in by using a unique metric TCPD (True Capital Per Dollar), which factors in challenge fees, minimum entry costs, drawdown limits, and overall value. Some firms are easier to start with, while others require a larger upfront commitment.
  • Trading Rules & Restrictions: Trading rules play a big role in how comfortable a firm is to trade with, so we reviewed them closely. We went beyond headline policies, reading the fine print, Terms and Conditions, FAQs, and detailed rule pages to understand what’s actually allowed in practice. This included checking support for automated and copy trading, holding positions overnight or over the weekend, trading around news events, and the smaller restrictions that often catch traders by surprise.
  • Trading Conditions: I traded the accounts myself to assess real trading costs, including spreads, commissions, and swaps, as well as execution quality such as slippage and order fills. I also tested liquidity during major news events to see whether trading conditions felt close to a real live market.
  • Global Availability: We looked at where each firm is actually available and who can open and trade an account without restrictions. Accessibility matters, since the last thing you want is to buy a challenge only to find out later that you’re not eligible to trade or withdraw based on where you’re located.
  • Profit-Split Structure: I compared and reviewed each firm’s profit split and payout structure, looking at how profits are shared, how often payouts are made, and what conditions apply when it’s time to withdraw earnings.
  • Trading Platforms: We looked at the trading platforms each firm offers, including MetaTrader, cTrader, Match-Trader, and others, and focused on how stable they are, how quickly trades execute, and whether the platform feels reliable for active trading.
  • Available Markets & Instruments: We reviewed the range of markets each firm allows you to trade, including forex, crypto, indices, metals, commodities, and stocks, along with how broad the overall instrument selection is.
  • Scaling Plans & Growth Potential: As a trader we want to have an uncapped growth potential, so we looked at whether firms offer a clear path to scaling, including maximum funding limits and what kind of performance is required to grow an account over time.
  • Customer Support Quality: We tested each firm’s customer support by contacting them through live chat and email, asking both general and technical questions to evaluate responsiveness and accuracy. We paid close attention to response times, clarity of explanations, and how effectively issues were resolved in practice.

Prop Firms Comparison Table

Firm Trust & Rating Challenges Lowest Entry Price  Platforms Profit Split Assets Payout Frequency US Traders Max Allocation
The5ers Excellent 1-step, 2-step, 3-step $39 MT5, cTrader 50–100% FX, Metals, Indices, Energy, Crypto Biweekly Yes Up to 615K
FundedNext Good Instant, 1-step, 2-step $32.99 MT4, MT5, cTrader, Match Trader 60–95% FX, Metals, Indices, Energy, Crypto On-Demand/ Bi-Weekly Yes Up to $300K
FundingPips Good Instant, 1-step,  2-step $29 MT5, cTrader, Match Trader 60–100% FX, Metals, Indices, Energy, Crypto Weekly/Biweekly Yes Up to $300K
FXIFY Good Instant, 1-step, 2-step,  3-step $39 MT4, MT5, DxTrade, TradingView 80–100% FX, Metals, Indices, Stocks, Commodities Biweekly Yes Up to $800K+

Best Overall

  • Price
    $39 – $850
  • Profit Split
    Up to 100%
  • Account Size
    $5K – $250K

I tested The5ers across key areas like reputation, challenge rules, cost efficiency, trading conditions, and payout policies, and it stood out as the strongest option overall. Its reputation is backed by verified payouts and clear funding programs that are easy to understand. Trading conditions feel competitive in day-to-day use, with tight spreads, reasonable commissions, and profit splits that scale as you grow. Copy trading and Expert Advisors are allowed within clear rules, which gives traders flexibility without adding unnecessary risk.

  • Clear and Transparent Rules: From trading these accounts myself, it’s clear why The5ers is widely trusted. The trading rules are clearly explained and transparent, with no hidden terms or surprise restrictions. Guidelines around news trading, Expert Advisors, stop-loss use, and copy trading are laid out upfront for each challenge type, so you know exactly what’s allowed before starting trading.
  • Multiple Challenge Types: As traders, flexibility matters to us, and The5ers delivers that with multiple challenge types, including 1-step, 2-step, and 3-step options. This range makes it easier to choose a challenge that fits your trading style and risk appetite.
  • Affordable Pricing: I compared The5ers’ pricing against the broader industry, looking beyond headline account sizes to the actual capital allocated once funded taking max drawdown into account (TCPD). From that perspective, it offers better value than many competitors because the money you get to trade with per dollar is more. With pricing ranging from $39 to $850 across different challenge types, traders can choose a challenge that aligns with their budget and trading goals.
  • Excellent Profit to Drawdown Ratios: Many prop firms design challenges with aggressive profit targets and tight drawdowns, which can make it hard to trade. That’s where The5ers feels different. From trading these accounts myself, its profit-to-drawdown ratios are noticeably more balanced than the industry average, reducing unnecessary pressure and allowing traders to focus on execution instead of constantly managing rule limits, which creates a more realistic path toward their goals.
  • Trusted Payouts: For traders, payouts are what matter most, and The5ers has one of the strongest track records in this area. The firm has paid out over $60 million across more than 27K verified withdrawals, with bi-weekly payouts that have proven to be consistent and reliable over time.
Pros
  • Clear scaling plan with potential to grow capital up to $4M and profit split up to 100%
  • Strong payout record (over $60M paid through verified payouts)
  • A monthly salary option is available with High Stakes accounts
  • Tight spreads and low commissions help reduce the cost of trading
  • No minimum profitable trading days in Bootcamp and Hyper Growth (easier pace)
Cons
  • Limited trading instruments compared to many other firms (around 40)
  • Mandatory Stop-loss in the 3-Step program

Best Price

  • Price
    $32 – $1,099
  • Profit Split
    Up to 95%
  • Account Size
    $2K – $200K

In my experience, FundedNext stands out for its pricing and overall value. Challenge fees start at $32.99, and after comparing costs myself, not just based on headline account sizes but on the actual capital allocated at the funded stage, it offers more funded capital per dollar than the industry average. The firm also supports multiple trading platforms, provides flexible payout options, and gives access to a wide range of markets, including forex, indices, metals, energy, and crypto, making it a solid option for traders who want affordable challenges.

  • Diverse Challenge Programs: In my view, FundedNext offers a wide range of challenge options, including 1-step, 2-step, Stellar Lite, and Instant programs, which give traders more flexibility in how they get funded. The different profit-to-drawdown setups make it easier to choose a structure that fits varying trading styles and risk preferences.
  • Low Entry Costs & Good Value: I compared FundedNext pricing against the broader industry by looking beyond headline account sizes to the actual capital allocated once funded (True Capital Per Dollar – TCPD). From that perspective, it offers stronger value than many competitors. What stands out most is the combination of a low entry cost and a high True Capital Per Dollar. Challenge fees start at $32.99 and range up to $1,099.99 across account types, making it one of the more affordable options while still covering the core features traders expect.
  • Multiple Platforms: What stood out to me with FundedNext was its support for multiple trading platforms, including MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, cTrader, and Match-Trader. 
  • Fast & Transparent Payouts with Scaling: FundedNext offers a profit share up to 95%. First payout is within 5-21 days, depending on the challenge, and accounts can scale up to $4M.
Pros
  • 15% Profit Share in Challenge Phase
  • Low entry fees ($32 for Stellar Lite).
  • Fast payouts (within 24 hrs; $68M+ paid).
  • Multiple platforms: MT4, MT5, Match Trader, cTrader.
  • Access to 70+ instruments.
Cons
  • No Three-step challenge
  • Crypto trades limited to 1:1 leverage.
  • Support can be slow at times.

Best Profit Split

  • Price
    $29 – $555
  • Profit Split
    Up to 100%
  • Account Size
    $5K – $100K

I tested FundingPips across all the key areas, and what stood out most was its flexibility around profit splits and payouts. Traders can choose from daily, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly, or on-demand withdrawals, which is more flexible than most firms offer. Eligible accounts can reach profit splits of up to 100%, and with access to multiple asset classes and trading platforms, FundingPips works well for traders who value payout freedom and adaptable trading setups. 

  • Flexible Payouts: From my testing, payouts are where FundingPips clearly stands out. Profit splits vary by payout frequency, starting at 60% for Tuesday payouts, increasing to 80% for bi-weekly, 90% for on-demand, and reaching up to 100% for monthly withdrawals. The 2-Step Pro account supports daily and weekly payouts at an 80% split, while the Zero (Instant) account offers bi-weekly payouts with a 95% split. This range of payout options gives traders more control over how and when they withdraw profits, which is less common across the industry.
  • Strong Scaling Plan: It offers a strong 4-level scaling system (Launchpad → Ascender → Trailblazer → Hot Seat) that allows traders to grow their capital up to $2 million while earning extra bonuses at each level.
  • Low Cost & Great Value: In my experience, beyond payout flexibility, FundingPips also stands out in cost. Challenge fees start at $29 and go up to $555, and its Pro and Instant accounts provide more funded capital per dollar than many competing firms.
  • Supports All Trading Styles: As traders, flexibility matters, and FundingPips allows a wider range of trading approaches than many firms. It supports news, swing, scalping, day trading, as well as automated and copy trading, giving traders more freedom in how they execute their strategies.
Pros
  • Profit splits up to 100% with flexible payouts (On-Demand, weekly, bi-weekly, monthly)
  • Low entry fees ($29–$555)
  • Scaling plan up to $2M funded capital
  • Supports MT5, cTrader, Match Trader
  • Fast payouts, verified via Payout Junction ($167M+ distributed)
  • Transparent rules and clear risk limits
Cons
  • A consistency rule applies to some accounts (15-35%)
  • 20 Lot limit on single click/trade
  • Restrictions on News Trading (Funded Stage)

Best Scaling Plan

  • Price
    $39 – $4249
  • Profit Split
    90%
  • Account Size
    $1K – $400K

To me, FXIFY really stood out because of its aggressive scaling model, allowing accounts to double after a 10% profit and scale up to $4 million. With multiple challenge options, high profit splits, on-demand payouts, and support for MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, TradingView, and DXtrade, it gives traders a lot of freedom in how they grow and trade.

  • Scaling & Growth Potential: As traders, we all want to grow the funding capital as quickly as possible, and FXIFY is built around that goal. Its scaling model allows accounts to double after a 10% profit and continue growing up to $4 million for consistent performers. 
  • Flexible Challenge Options: FXIFY offers 1-Phase, 2-Phase (Standard & Classic), 3-Phase, Instant, and Lightning challenges that let traders pick the path that fits their style.
  • Multiple Trading Platforms: For me, beyond its scaling plan, what stands out about FXIFY is the breadth of platform support. With access to MetaTrader 4, MetaTrader 5, DXtrade, and TradingView, traders can work across more than 100 instruments.
  • Funding Range &  Pricing: Having a range of account sizes makes it easier to match risk and growth goals, and FXIFY offers plenty of flexibility on that front. Entry fees start at $39, with funding options from $1K up to $400Kand pricing that runs from $39 to $4,249 depending on account size. Optional add-ons let traders increase profit splits or shorten payout timelines, giving them more control over how their account is structured.
  • Payouts: Payout splits range from 80% to 100%, with payout frequency options that include on-demand, bi-weekly, and monthly withdrawals, giving traders both flexibility and a clear path to scale.
Pros
  • Scaling plan up to $4M
  • Flexible payout options: on-demand, bi-weekly, monthly
  • 4 Trading Platforms: MT4, MT5, DXTrade, and TradingView
  • Over 100 tradable instruments across forex, stocks, indices, metals, crypto
Cons
  • Low leverage
  • Minimum trading day requirements (3–5 days) on most accounts
  • Swap-free accounts not available

How to Choose the Best Prop Firm

What Features to Consider When Choosing a Prop Firm?

Choosing a prop firm is not an easy task and isn’t one-size-fits-all. The right firm depends on your trading style, strategy, and long-term objectives. When comparing prop firms, these are the key factors worth paying attention to:

  • Trust & Transparency: You need to review the firm’s reputation, years in operation, Trustpilot ratings, and verified trader feedback to assess credibility and reliability.
  • Trading Rules: In my experience, important details are often buried in the fine print, so it’s essential to read a firm’s trading rules, terms, and conditions carefully. A reliable firm clearly outlines its trading rules, with realistic profit targets, fair drawdown limits, and no hidden or overly restrictive conditions.
  • Supported Trading Styles: It’s important to choose a firm whose rules match your trading style. A swing trader, for example, could face unnecessary losses if overnight holding isn’t allowed. Check whether the firm supports the way you trade, including permission for Expert Advisors and copy trading for automated strategies, overnight and weekend positions for swing trading, reasonable leverage for day trading, and news trading without unnecessary restrictions if you trade around economic events.
  • Payout Structure: You need to evaluate profit split percentages and payout frequency to confirm they are fair, competitive, and aligned with industry standards.
  • Scaling Plan: Growth and scaling are important for us as traders, so you need to look for a transparent scaling program that increases capital allocation as performance milestones are met, offering meaningful long-term growth potential.
  • Customer Support: When issues come up, having reliable support makes a real difference. From firsthand experience, firms with responsive customer service and clear, accurate answers were able to resolve account and trading issues much faster. So, you need to ensure that the firm you are choosing has reliable and quick customer support with multiple channels.

Which Firm Suits My Trading Style?

Different traders have different needs, and choosing the right prop firm depends on how you trade. Below is a clearer way to match trading styles with suitable firms:

  • Scalpers & Algo Traders: In my opinion, The5ers provides favorable trading conditions, tight spreads, and clear rules for scalping and automated strategies. It has a clear stance for EA’s and copy trading, and is pretty suitable for you if you want to trade automated strategies. Its tight spread helps in quick scalping, but keep in mind that high frequency trading is not allowed.
  • Beginners: If you’re just getting started, it makes sense to begin with an affordable challenge and limit upfront risk. FundedNext is a good fit for beginners, offering multiple challenge options across different risk levels. Its straightforward onboarding, simple account structures, and clean trading interfaces make it easier to focus on learning and execution without unnecessary complexity.
  • Day Traders: For day traders, execution speed and leverage play a big role, and Funding Pips is well suited to that style. It offers leverage of up to 1:100, solid liquidity, competitive fees, and execution that holds up well during active intraday trading.
  • Swing Traders: For swing traders, firms must allow overnight and weekend holding, since trades are typically held for several days, and swap-free accounts are ideal to avoid unnecessary holding costs. In this regard, The5ers and FundedNext are well suited to this style. The5ers offers swap-free accounts for Muslim traders, while FundedNext provides a swap-free option via an add-on. Both structures support longer-term trades without penalizing time in the market.
  • News Traders: As a trader, sometimes you want to scalp during news, and many firms protect against this behavior by implementing a No Trading Window around news, but FXIFY stands out here as it permits news trading without restrictions across its one-phase, two-phase (Classic and Standard), and three-phase account models, making it suitable for event-driven strategies.

What Costs Should You Consider When Choosing a Prop Firm?

A lot of traders don’t realize the full range of costs they’ll run into until they’re already trading, which can be frustrating. From going through these accounts myself, I’ve learned that understanding the complete cost structure is just as important as the challenge rules. When evaluating a prop firm, here are the key costs worth paying attention to:

  • Challenge Fees: Start by looking at the upfront fee required to enter a challenge, which usually depends on the account size you choose. From experience, this is often the first cost traders notice, but it’s also where pricing can vary the most between firms.
  • Commission Fees: You need to understand the per-trade commissions charged on executed trades, commonly around $5 per lot, depending on the instrument and firm.
  • Spreads: Spreads are one of the biggest factors affecting both trading costs and overall performance. The tighter the spread, the better it usually is for you as a trader. It’s worth paying attention to the difference between buy and sell prices, since wider spreads can quickly eat into profits, especially if you trade frequently or use short-term strategies.
  • Swap Fees: If you are a swing trader, it is important to keep an eye on overnight or weekend holding costs known as swap fees, which are charged when positions are carried beyond the trading day, based on interest rate differentials between assets.
  • Withdrawal Fees: Some firms charge fees when you withdraw profits, and in a few cases the payout method itself can come with additional costs. From experience, these charges can add up and reduce your overall returns, so it’s worth checking withdrawal fees and payment terms in advance.

What Challenge Types Are Available?

When choosing a proprietary trading firm, it is important to understand the types of accounts offered, since each one is designed for a different trading style, pace, and level of difficulty. Below are the most common challenge models you’ll come across.

  • Instant Funding: If you already have a proven strategy and want immediate access to funded capital, instant funding accounts can be a good fit so it is important to check that the firm you are choosing provides an instant finding account. From experience, these accounts skip the evaluation phase but are usually more expensive and come with stricter rules, so it’s worth weighing the trade-offs before committing.
  • One-Step Challenge: If you prefer a faster path to getting funded, the one-step challenge is usually the simplest option. It involves passing a single evaluation phase, which means fewer rules to manage and less time spent proving consistency. From experience, this model suits traders who are confident in their strategy and don’t want a long evaluation process.
  • Two-Step Challenge: The two-step challenge is the most common setup across prop firms. As a trader, you need to pass two evaluation phases before receiving a funded account, which adds an extra layer of confirmation around consistency and risk management. In practice, this model works well for traders who are comfortable trading under rules and don’t mind taking a bit more time to reach funding.
  • Three-Step Challenge: Three-step challenges are usually the most affordable option and are built for slower, more controlled progression. With multiple evaluation phases, the emphasis is on consistency rather than speed. From what I’ve seen, this structure works well for traders who want a lower-cost entry, time to practice in a prop environment, and a longer runway to follow the rules and demonstrate consistent performance before getting funded.

What to Avoid When Choosing a Prop Firm

In the prop trading space, it’s important to be cautious when something looks too good to be true. When selecting a proprietary trading firm, focusing only on low prices or heavy discounts can lead to poor outcomes. Consider avoiding the following pitfalls:

  • Choosing Price Over Trust: Extremely cheap challenge fees can sometimes signal trade-offs like unclear rules, unreliable payouts, or weak reputations. From experience, it’s safer to prioritize a firm’s credibility, track record, and trader feedback over short-term discounts.
  • Focusing Only on Notional Account Size: Large advertised account sizes can be misleading. Evaluate the actual drawdown limits and risk parameters, as these determine how much capital you can realistically trade.
  • Unclear or Restrictive Rules: Avoid firms with vague, frequently changing, or overly restrictive trading rules that can disqualify traders unexpectedly.
  • Inconsistent or Delayed Payouts: Firms without a proven payout history or with repeated withdrawal complaints pose a higher risk.
  • Limited Transparency: Lack of clear information on fees, scaling plans, or trading conditions is a red flag and should be treated cautiously.

Get to Know Our Authors

Ebube JonesProp Firm Analyst

Ebube Jones began his career in finance writing in 2019, focusing on forex, stocks, and market analysis. He has produced in-depth articles on trading strategies, broker reviews, and investment vehicles,.

Muhammad SobanProp Firm Analyst

Leveraging years of hands-on experience, Soban provides in-depth reviews of proprietary trading firms, carefully evaluating their models, rules, and impact on traders.

About the Author

Muhammad SobanProp Firm Analyst

Leveraging years of hands-on experience, Soban provides in-depth reviews of proprietary trading firms, carefully evaluating their models, rules, and impact on traders.

Why you can trust FXEmpire

At FXEmpire, we strive to provide unbiased, thorough and accurate prop firms reviews by industry experts to help our users make smarter financial decisions.

Why you can trust FXEmpire

Founded in 2011, FXEmpire is one of the first and most trusted forex broker review platforms. With over 15 years of experience in the forex and CFD trading industry, we've expanded our expertise to include a dedicated section for proprietary trading firm reviews. Our reviews are based on a rigorous, unbiased assessment conducted by a team of industry experts and financial journalists. Each review provides clear, accurate, and impartial insights to help traders make confident decisions. Our review methodology is built around 6 core categories and over 100 measurable variables, ensuring that every key aspect of a prop firm is thoroughly analyzed before a final rating is given. By combining objective data with real-world testing, we deliver honest, research-backed reviews that empower you to choose the right prop firm to support your trading journey and financial goals.