Currency re-evaluation: A looming reality or a wild card?

Currency re-evaluation: A looming reality or a wild card?

The subject of global currency revaluation has sparked a lot of controversy over the years; some commentators are counting down the days until it will no longer be a choice, and others are adamant that such a possibility does not exist.

Currency standardisation did not appear until 1940, when two World Wars and an impending second Great Depression drove the Allied Nations to the Bretton Woods agreement. This saw the international gold standard pegged to the U.S dollar. Exchange rates would remain, in order for the Allies’ to ensure that their currencies continued to stay within at least a 1% parity with the USD by relying on money supply measures and forex trading.

This meant that gold was knocked off its pedestal as the main reserve currency, and was replaced by the US dollar. The idea seemed good, at the time, but it eventually become unhinged. The discontinuation of USD to gold conversion in 1971 by the Nixon Administration effectively put an end to Bretton Woods. By 1973, currencies began floating freely and currency trading as we know it today began.

In more recent years, the 2008 economic crisis shook the world to such an extent that it had the potential to stir governments into re-thinking international monetary policy. That being said, if central banks were to start thinking about revaluating global currency, they would need to accept their own limits in executing money supply measures. Even when the monetary crisis peaked, none of them were inclined to give up national fiscal policy, and currency revaluation was dismissed.

Recently, Special Drawing Rights (SDRs) have come onto the radar, especially since China was added to the pool in late 2016. SDR’s were devised in the 1960s, in response to a looming crisis in the US. They were created by the IMF in 1969 to supplement the existing official reserves of member countries. Countries could exchange SDRs for hard currency at the IMF.

From 1950 to 1969, the German and Japanese economies recovered from the war and the US share of the world’s economic output dropped from 35% to 27%. They also incurred a negative balance of payments, and a massive debt that was fuelled by the Vietnam War. Adding to their woes was growing Inflation that caused the dollar to become overvalued. By 1966, non-US central banks held $14 billion, while the United States had only $13.2 billion in gold reserve. Of those reserves, only $3.2 billion was able to cover foreign holdings as the rest was covering domestic holdings.

The SDR was equivalent to 0.888671 grams of gold then, or one US dollar, and after the Woods system fell apart, the SDR became valued by a ‘basket of currencies’. Its units were made up of USD, EUR, GBP, JPY, and, as of late, RMB.

Could this be the perfect potential reserve currency? Unfortunately, the SDR currently lacks liquidity, meaning there aren’t enough baskets available to back international fiscal policy.

However, China has always been an advocate of the SDR. With the country becoming more involved in global financial matters, and its currency now included in the basket, it’s hardly surprising. Chinese GDP is predicted to take top spot in the rankings, with the US falling to second place in the next twenty years, and many economists are advocates for the RMB (Renminbi) to become the world’s next reserve currency – regardless of its current trading limitations.

If 2017’s political turmoil has shown us anything, it is that geopolitics will continue to impact forex trading and currency markets. Revaluation will continue to be an interesting possibility, and in the current political and economic landscape, definitive answers regarding its eventual implementation are a risk that most pundits are not willing to commit to.

This article is written by Samantha Robb, a staff writer at FXTM

Don't miss a thing!

Discover what's moving the markets. Sign up for a daily update delivered to your inbox

Latest Articles

See All

Expand Your Knowledge

See All
The content provided on the website includes general news and publications, our personal analysis and opinions, and contents provided by third parties, which are intended for educational and research purposes only. It does not constitute, and should not be read as, any recommendation or advice to take any action whatsoever, including to make any investment or buy any product. When making any financial decision, you should perform your own due diligence checks, apply your own discretion and consult your competent advisors. The content of the website is not personally directed to you, and we does not take into account your financial situation or needs.The information contained in this website is not necessarily provided in real-time nor is it necessarily accurate. Prices provided herein may be provided by market makers and not by exchanges.Any trading or other financial decision you make shall be at your full responsibility, and you must not rely on any information provided through the website. FX Empire does not provide any warranty regarding any of the information contained in the website, and shall bear no responsibility for any trading losses you might incur as a result of using any information contained in the website.The website may include advertisements and other promotional contents, and FX Empire may receive compensation from third parties in connection with the content. FX Empire does not endorse any third party or recommends using any third party's services, and does not assume responsibility for your use of any such third party's website or services.FX Empire and its employees, officers, subsidiaries and associates, are not liable nor shall they be held liable for any loss or damage resulting from your use of the website or reliance on the information provided on this website.
This website includes information about cryptocurrencies, contracts for difference (CFDs) and other financial instruments, and about brokers, exchanges and other entities trading in such instruments. Both cryptocurrencies and CFDs are complex instruments and come with a high risk of losing money. You should carefully consider whether you understand how these instruments work and whether you can afford to take the high risk of losing your money.FX Empire encourages you to perform your own research before making any investment decision, and to avoid investing in any financial instrument which you do not fully understand how it works and what are the risks involved.