Advertisement
Advertisement

Can Curve’s, veToken Model Be the Future of Defi Token Design?

By:
Varuni Trivedi

The ve-token model by Curve, is advocated as a model that can be beneficial for protocols in the DeFi space, but what difference can it make?

FXempire, CurveDAO, Crypto, CURVE

The year 2021 has been a stellar time for the larger cryptocurrency market, with top coins like Bitcoin and Ethereum making new price all-time highs. That said, the global crypto market cap also continued to explode parabolically as most altcoin ecosystems saw decent growth. However, 2020’s star performers which were DeFi tokens, mostly underperformed relative to the larger market. 

Over the last couple of years, DeFi protocols have generated millions in revenue and seen a staggering rise in the use and adoption of their products. However, it has been a bumpy ride in the last year as skepticism around the tokenomics of certain protocols rose. This also gave rise to better models such as veToken model that could shape the future of DeFi token design.

Flaws in the Tokenomics

Many market experts are of the opinion that the early models of DeFi token design were pretty flawed and gave rise to massive value destruction at the cost of retail investors. While most protocols used the idea of valueless governance tokens to rise to prominence in 2020, the model had some issues. As per the model, token holders strictly have governance rights, but that wasn’t true in every case. 

DeFi giants like Uniswap and Compound for instance used the aforementioned model to fuel their growth and the same aided a huge rise in TVL for the tokens. However, COMP and UNI are ‘valueless’ governance tokens since there is no direct economic benefit, like a right to cash flows, for holding them.

While the model isn’t considered ideal it was needed to avoid regulatory scrutiny and allowed these protocols to tokenize faster. 

veToken Model vs Tradition DeFi

There are some major upsides of the veToken model, vs  tradition DeFi models:

  • It encourages long-term-oriented decision-making by incentivizing the same and ensuring long-term commitment to the protocol.
  • It offers greater incentive alignment across protocol participants. The ve-model has proven to be beneficial since it can align incentives across a wide swath of protocol participants and stakeholders.
  • Lastly, it improves supply and demand dynamics by helping numbers go up.

Rise of veTokens

Since the valueless governance model had diminishing returns, the ve-token model has emerged as a popular alternative among DAOs to the valueless governance token regime. It aimed to encourage long-term-oriented decision-making, aligning incentives across protocol stakeholders, and creating favorable supply and demand dynamics for price appreciation.

Notably, many claimed that major DeFi 1.0 tokens that have the valueless governance token model didn’t perform well. Curve on the other hand at press time had a DeFi dominance of 9.75%, as its TVL stood at $18.9 Billion. 

The veToken model or vote-escrowed model is pioneered by Curve’s CRV and aims to instill value into valueless governance tokens. It also involves token-holders taking on the risk of locking their tokens in exchange for specific rights, such as governance power, within a protocol. For now, many in the market are of the opinion that veTokens could be shaping the future of DeFi tokenomics.

About the Author

A Journalism post-graduate with a keen interest in emerging markets across South East Asia, Varuni’s interest lies in the Blockchain technology. As a financial journalist, she covers metric and data-driven stories with a tinge of commentary, and strongly believes in HODLing.

Did you find this article useful?

Advertisement