A financial regulator is the representative body of the government in a given jurisdiction. It is responsible for ensuring the stability and transparency of market operations within said jurisdiction.
In the forex and CFDs industry, financial regulators are responsible for determining how brokers treat their clients and what safety mechanisms they must provide to ensure the protection of retail and professional traders.
Financial regulators play a critical role in overseeing the Forex and CFD industry, ensuring that markets operate smoothly, transparently, and fairly. Here’s how these regulators typically operate:
Before Forex and CFD brokers can offer their services to the public, they must first obtain a license from the relevant financial regulatory authority in their jurisdiction. This process involves rigorous background checks, audits, and compliance with financial standards to ensure the broker is financially sound and capable of upholding the rights and securities of their clients.
Regulators establish and enforce rules and standards that brokers must follow. These standards often relate to capital adequacy (ensuring brokers have enough capital to cover their market exposures), fair trading practices, mandatory disclosure of terms and conditions to traders, and reporting requirements. These standards are designed to maintain the integrity of the financial markets and protect consumer interests.
Regulators continuously monitor the operations of licensed brokers. This includes regular audits, both scheduled and unscheduled, reviews of trading practices, and the scrutiny of financial reports submitted by the brokers. This monitoring helps ensure ongoing compliance and that brokers do not engage in manipulative or unfair trading practices.
Regulators enforce compliance through a variety of mechanisms, including fines, sanctions, and in some cases, revocation of licenses. They can take action against brokers who fail to meet their regulatory obligations or who engage in illegal activities such as fraud.
Financial regulators also work to protect consumers by ensuring that brokers provide clear and accurate information about their products and the risks involved in trading. Many regulators also run educational campaigns to inform and educate traders about the Forex and CFD markets, the risks involved, and best practices in trading.
Since the Forex and CFD markets are global, regulators often coordinate with their counterparts in other countries to oversee and regulate cross-border operations and transactions. This cooperation helps to ensure that brokers operating in multiple jurisdictions adhere to a consistent set of standards and that there is oversight of international activities.
In times of financial crisis or significant market volatility, regulators may step in more directly to stabilize the market. This can include temporary restrictions on trading activities, changes in margin requirements, or other emergency measures to protect market integrity and trader funds.
The trader protections mandated by financial regulators can be separated into several categories, subject to the type of risk they are intended to reduce. These categories include:
Type of Protection | Type of Risk |
Segregated client funds | Risk of fraudulent activity/negligence |
Negative balance protection, best execution policy | Direct trading risk |
Maximum leverage allowed | Margin trading risk |
Compensation scheme | Counterparty risk (risk of default) |
Brokers are required to keep their clients’ funds in separate bank accounts from the ones used for their corporate capital. This is necessary in order to diminish the risk of fraudulent activity and accounting errors. Almost all financial regulators mandate the segregation of client funds.
Negative balance protection is arguably the most important safety mechanism. It ensures that a trader’s losses cannot exceed his or her account balance. Essentially, in cases when, due to adverse market volatility, a trader’s balance turns negative, the broker is required to pay the difference so that the account balance returns to $0.
Brokers that operate under a ‘best execution policy’ are required to deliver the best possible price feeds (quotes) under the prevailing market conditions. This mechanism is crucial for high-precision trading.
Leverage is often referred to as a ‘double-edged dagger’ because it boosts the profits you generate from winning trades and the losses you incur from failed ones. Most top-tier regulators thus maintain a cap on the maximum leverage allowed (typically at 1:30), whereas offshore regulators may waive any such restrictions.
If you are an inexperienced trader, it is better to request the lowest possible leverage, even if you are permitted to go much higher.
A compensation scheme is a protective mechanism set up by financial regulators to safeguard investors’ funds in the event of a broker’s failure or insolvency. These schemes function by providing financial compensation to traders if their broker is unable to return their funds due to financial difficulties.
For example, brokers regulated by the Cyprus Securities and Exchange Commission (CySEC) also participate in the Investors Compensation Fund (ICF). Their clients are protected by up to EUR 20,000.
Some brokers who are not mandated by their regulators to participate in such compensation schemes choose to go the extra mile by issuing private indemnity insurance on their own accord.
Not all regulators are the same. Some impose strict requirements, while others, typically offshore regulators, have more relaxed mandates. A regulator’s requirements can vary significantly in both scope and rigor.
The stricter the financial regulator, the greater the protections for the retail trader. However, this also comes with certain limitations. For example, experienced retail traders may be unable to access high maximum leverage with a broker authorized by a Tier-1 regulator.
Financial regulators differ based on the jurisdiction where they operate and the level of protection they guarantee. We rate them on a three-tier system based on the number and type of individual protections they ensure.
The table below provides a rough visualization of the safety mechanisms you can expect from different tier regulators. Dark green means very safe, light green implies looser protection, and red means no protection at all.
Safety Mechanisms* | Tier 1 | Tier 2 | Tier 3 | Unregulated |
Segregated Funds | Yes | Yes | Yes | Yes** |
Negative Balance Protection | Yes | Most | Some | Some** |
Best Execution Policy | Yes | Most | No | No |
Max. Leverage | Up to 1:30*** | Up to 1:400 | Up to 1:3000 | No Restrictions |
Compensation Scheme | Some | No | No | No |
*Please keep in mind that this table provides only a general overview. There could be differences from one regulator to another
**Up to the broker. There are no guarantees
***1:100 with FINMA
It’s important to remember that just because a broker is regulated, it does not necessarily mean it must comply with the strictest safety mechanisms in the industry. Based on the level of their regulation, brokers can be categorized as follows:
Companies aiming to tap into international markets must establish branches overseas. This involves complying with various legal requirements that often differ from one jurisdiction to another. This is what causes the ‘different taste’ of their product overseas, and the same principle applies to Forex and CFD brokers.
Brokers open multiple entities to attract clients from different countries. Additionally, they might branch out due to cost considerations. Offshore regulators often have much lower capital requirements compared to European ones, and the cost of obtaining a license is usually significantly cheaper.
The difference between regulated and offshore (often unregulated) broker entities primarily lies in the level of regulatory oversight and the protections afforded to investors. Here’s a closer look at each:
Regulated brokers operate under the supervision of regulatory bodies. These entities ensure that brokers adhere to specific standards that protect the interests of traders and investors. Key features include:
Offshore brokers operate in jurisdictions that either do not have regulatory oversight or have very lax regulations. They are often based in places known for being tax havens and typically provide less transparency. Characteristics include:
While the potential for higher profits might draw traders to offshore brokers, the risks associated with them are significantly higher. Investors using these platforms may have little recourse in the event of disputes or financial issues. Therefore, while trading with regulated brokers might involve more restrictions and potentially higher costs, it also offers greater security and investor protection.
When a forex broker is regulated by a top-tier regulator, such as FCA UK or ASIC, it indicates that the broker adheres to strict regulatory standards designed to protect traders. However, being regulated by the FCA does not necessarily mean that an FCA-regulated entity will accept every trader from around the world.
Regulatory compliance often restricts brokers from serving clients from specific jurisdictions due to varying local regulations. This means that traders from certain countries may be redirected to other entities of the same broker, which could be regulated in different jurisdictions, possibly with looser regulations.
Some unregulated brokers maintain that they ensure most of the essential safety requirements (e.g., segregated funds and negative balance protection). However, this cannot be confirmed because there is no independent regulatory body to guarantee it.
A major risk of trading with an unregulated broker is the lack of legal repercussions for improper behavior. For instance, if your account balance turns negative, the unregulated entity is entirely responsible for deciding whether or not to reimburse your losses.
Trading with unregulated brokers carries several significant risks that can affect both the security of your funds and the overall trading experience. Here are some of the main risks associated with trading with unregulated brokers:
Here is a brief recap of the essential safety requirements to look for, with respect to safety and regulation, in a broker. The more factors that are true for a broker, the safer it is:
Safety Mechanism | Field | Suggested Value | What it Does | Where to Confirm It |
Segregated Funds | General Safety | NA | Reduces the risk of accounting errors | Client Agreement |
Negative Balance Protection | General Safety | NA | Removes the risk of incurring losses that exceed the account balance | Client Agreement |
Compensation Scheme/Private Indemnity Insurance | General Safety | From EUR 20,000 (ICF) | Protects the trader from counterparty risk | Website of the regulator/insurer |
Capping the Maximum Retail Leverage | General Safety | At 1:30 | Protects the trader from adverse volatility | The account type’s specifications |
Best Execution Policy | Transparency | NA | Ensures optimal price quotes | Legal Documents |
Client Categorization Policy | Transparency | NA | Ensures traders are assigned the right account type based on their experience level | Legal Documents/During account creation |
Order Execution Statements | Transparency | NA | Proves that the broker maintains superior execution standards | Legal Documents |
Risk Warning | Transparency | NA | Ensures traders are aware of the trading risk | Top/bottom of the website/Legal Documents |
Stop-Out Level | Trading Risk | 50% | A mechanism that terminates losing trades automatically | The account type’s specifications |
Limited Stop Order Distance | Trading Risk | 0 pips | A requirement for where to place stop-loss/take-profit orders | The account type’s specifications |
Choosing a trustworthy broker is extremely important for your long-term success as a trader. Inexperienced traders, in particular, need to make sure they pick a broker that delivers all essential safety mechanisms, such as segregated funds, negative balance protection, and more.
Traders should also keep in mind that simply because a broker is regulated, this does not necessarily mean that it adheres to the most stringent safety requirements out there. Some offshore regulators have much more relaxed requirements, which results in much weaker safety policies put in place.
Finance writer, analyst, and author of a book for beginner traders "Bulls, Bears and Sharks" with an experience of over 8 years in retail trading and more than 3 years in the finance area.